A Report on the Implementation of the Blooming Biology Tool: Aligning Course Learning Outcomes with Assessments and Promoting Consistency in a Large Multi-Section First-Year Biology Course

dc.creator	Carol Pollock
dc.creator	Gülnur Birol
dc.creator	Angie O'Neill
dc.date	2010-06-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned	2015-08-12T11:32:21Z
dc.date.available	2015-08-12T11:32:21Z
dc.identifier	http://dx.doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2010.1.8
dc.identifier	1918-2902
dc.identifier	https://doaj.org/article/811a5a07757d406894169e5b41580ad5
dc.identifier.uri	http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/31172
dc.description	The objectives of this study were to investigate the alignment of exam questions with course learning outcomes in a first year biology majors course, to examine gaps and overlaps in assessment of content amongst the sections of the course, and to use this information to provide feedback to the teaching team to further improve the course. Our ultimate goal was to provide students with learning outcomes that would clearly indicate the content and the level at which they would be expected to learn the content for this course, regardless of the section in which they were registered. We took an evidence-based approach to course evaluation and employed the Blooming Biology Tool to compare the learning outcomes and the exam questions of the course, investigating whether the cognitive skill level of each learning outcome as written matched the level at which it was assessed. We identified misalignments and recommended revising the learning outcomes to better reflect the intended level of learning for the course. We also investigated student performance on exam questions of different cognitive levels and found that students scored statistically significantly higher (p < .05) on questions in which learning outcomes were tested at the stated cognitive skill level compared to at a higher level.Les objectifs de cette étude étaient (1) d’examiner la correspondance entre les questions d’examen et les résultats en matière d’apprentissage pour un cours de première année d’une majeure en biologie, (2) d’étudier les écarts et les chevauchements en matière d’évaluation du contenu des sections du cours et (3) d’utiliser ces informations pour fournir de la rétroaction à l’équipe des enseignants afin d’améliorer le cours. Notre but ultime était de faire en sorte que les résultats de l’apprentissage des étudiants indiquent clairement le contenu à apprendre et le niveau cognitif qu’ils devraient avoir atteint, peu importe la section à laquelle ils s’étaient inscrits. Nous avons utilisé une approche basée sur les données probantes pour évaluer le cours ainsi que l’outil de taxonomie de Bloom appliqué à biologie pour comparer les résultats d’apprentissage et les questions d’examen du cours. Nous souhaitions ainsi vérifier si le niveau de compétences cognitives tel qu’il est écrit pour chaque résultat d’apprentissage correspondait au niveau auquel il était évalué. Nous avons découvert des correspondances inadéquates et avons recommandé de réviser les résultats d’apprentissage pour mieux refléter le niveau d’apprentissage souhaité dans le cours. Nous avons également étudié la performance des étudiants aux questions d’examens en fonction de différents niveaux cognitifs et avons découvert que les résultats des étudiants étaient significativement plus élevés sur le plan statistique (p < 0,05) pour les questions où les résultats d’apprentissage étaient vérifiés au niveau des compétences cognitives déclaré, plutôt qu’à un niveau plus élevé.
dc.language	English
dc.language	French
dc.publisher	Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
dc.relation	http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cjsotl_rcacea/vol1/iss1/8
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/1918-2902
dc.source	Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning , Vol 1, Iss 1 (2010)
dc.subject	learning objectives
dc.subject	assessment
dc.subject	biology
dc.subject	Blooming Biology Tool
dc.subject	large classes
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.title	A Report on the Implementation of the Blooming Biology Tool: Aligning Course Learning Outcomes with Assessments and Promoting Consistency in a Large Multi-Section First-Year Biology Course
dc.type	article