dc.creator |
Tomaz Tadeu |
|
dc.date |
2005-12-01T00:00:00Z |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-08-12T11:35:19Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-08-12T11:35:19Z |
|
dc.identifier |
10.1590/S0101-73302005000400014 |
|
dc.identifier |
0101-7330 |
|
dc.identifier |
1678-4626 |
|
dc.identifier |
https://doaj.org/article/7fdf14b14f364f7294b3dc4e48076d8c |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/31347 |
|
dc.description |
Discuto algumas das questões propostas por François Zourabichvili em "Deleuze e a questão da literalidade", publicado neste mesmo dossiê. Argumento que: a) a literalidade, tal como apresentada por Zourabichvili, deixa igualmente inexplicadas as relações metafóricas de que pretende dar conta; b) a metáfora e a literalidade não são equiparáveis: a primeira, enquanto operação lingüística supõe uma equivalência semântica; a segunda, enquanto operação material supõe uma equivalência pragmática; c) Deleuze e Guattari oferecem uma visão da literalidade muito mais simples e direta do a que propõe Zourabichvili.<br>This paper discusses some of the issues François Zourabichvili raised in his "Deleuze and the question of literality", also in this collection. Its arguments are: 1) As Zourabichvili presents it, the notion of literality, does not account for the metaphoric relationships he intends to explain; 2) metaphor and literality are not commensurate since the former, as a linguistic operation, presupposes a semantic equivalence, and the latter, as a material operation, presupposes a pragmatic equivalence; c) Deleuze and Guattari give us a much more simple and direct view of literality than that proposed by Zourabichvili. |
|
dc.language |
Portuguese |
|
dc.language |
Spanish |
|
dc.language |
English |
|
dc.publisher |
Centro de Estudos Educação e Sociedade - Cedes |
|
dc.relation |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-73302005000400014 |
|
dc.relation |
https://doaj.org/toc/0101-7330 |
|
dc.relation |
https://doaj.org/toc/1678-4626 |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY-NC |
|
dc.source |
Educação & Sociedade, Vol 26, Iss 93, Pp 1331-1338 (2005) |
|
dc.subject |
Literalidade |
|
dc.subject |
Metáfora |
|
dc.subject |
Pragmática |
|
dc.subject |
Literality |
|
dc.subject |
Metaphor |
|
dc.subject |
Pragmatics |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Education (General) |
|
dc.subject |
L7-991 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.title |
Deleuze e a questão da literalidade: uma via alternativa Deleuze and the question of literality: an alternative path |
|
dc.type |
article |
|