Think! Evidence

Decision-making and uncertainty: The role of heuristics and experience in assessing a politically hazardous environment

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Maitland, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.author Sammartino, André
dc.date.accessioned 2015-03-11T13:58:58Z
dc.date.available 2015-03-11T13:58:58Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.citation Strategic Management Journal
dc.identifier.issn 1097-0266
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.2297
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/44
dc.description.abstract Heuristics have long been associated with problems of bias and framing error, often on the basis of simulation and laboratory studies. In this field study of a high-stakes strategic decision, we explore an alternative view that heuristics may serve as powerful cognitive tools that enable, rather than limit, decision-making in dynamic and uncertain environments. We examine the cognitive efforts of senior decision-makers of an inexperienced multinational, as they assessed a potential acquisition in a politically hazardous African country. They applied a diversity of heuristics, some with clear building block rules, to build small world representations of this very uncertain strategic context. More expert individuals drew on experiential learning to build richer representations of the political hazard environment.
dc.subject Decision Making
dc.subject Heuristics and biases
dc.title Decision-making and uncertainty: The role of heuristics and experience in assessing a politically hazardous environment
dc.type Article
dc.rights.holder This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account