Think! Evidence

Declared Knowledge of Beginning Writers.

Show simple item record

dc.creator Morin, M.F.
dc.date 2005-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:05:28Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:05:28Z
dc.identifier 1567-6617
dc.identifier 1573-1731
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/fdefe080a9d34704b1ff46ba0e88530b
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/9771
dc.identifier.uri https://doaj.org/article/fdefe080a9d34704b1ff46ba0e88530b
dc.description Most studies of the orthographic development of young writers have largely centred their attention on analyses of written productions. However, an increasing number of researchers are now devoting attention to the information provided by spoken comments made by writers during a production activity. Re- ferred to as metagraphic comments, these utterances give researchers access to young writers’ conceptualizations of written language and the various processes mobilized during a writing task. This article presents the results of a Quebec study aimed at grasping the nature of metagraphic comments and establishing their relationship to writing performance. This research was conducted with 67 French-language subjects who were each given an individual word-writing task at two different moments (at mid-year and year end) in grade one. The analysis of the metagraphic comments, using a grid to categorize them, revealed that young writers have many and varied notions about written French, even at the beginning stages of their schooling. This analysis also led to the observation that comments related to what is thought about language – metalinguistic comments – are much more numerous than those revealing thoughts about cognitive processes at work during the writing activity. Lastly, correlation analyses, which enabled an examination of the relationship between the nature of metagraphic comments and writing performance, suggest that the use of spoken aloud comments during a writing activity does not have the same impact on weak and strong writers.
dc.language English
dc.publisher Springer
dc.relation http://l1.publication-archive.com/next?cont=HGJzrOZvD3U=
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1567-6617
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1573-1731
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND
dc.source L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, Vol 5, Iss 3, Pp 385-401 (2005)
dc.subject elementary school (Grade 1)
dc.subject metagraphic comments
dc.subject metalinguistic knowledge
dc.subject orthographic strategies
dc.subject spelling development
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject DOAJ:Linguistics
dc.subject DOAJ:Languages and Literatures
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject DOAJ:Linguistics
dc.subject DOAJ:Languages and Literatures
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Philology. Linguistics
dc.subject P1-1091
dc.subject Language and Literature
dc.subject P
dc.subject Theory and practice of education
dc.subject LB5-3640
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Declared Knowledge of Beginning Writers.
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account