Think! Evidence

Self-estimates of job performance and learning potential

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wolman, Stacey D. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-01-22T15:53:48Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-13T10:56:13Z
dc.date.available 2009-01-22T15:53:48Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-13T10:56:13Z
dc.date.issued 2008-10-07 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1853/26649
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/1853/26649
dc.description.abstract In the organizational domain, it is well established that a significant relationship exists between cognitive ability and job performance (e.g., Hunter, 1986); however, there is less research surrounding the relationship between how intelligent people think they are and expectations of job performance. Although self-estimates have been used in the educational domain since the early 1900s (e.g., self-estimates of ability; Koerth & Rush, 1923; Schutte, 1929; personality traits; Cogan, Conklin, & Hollingworth, 1915; Shen, 1925) they have only recently been applied to the workplace as predictors of job search behavior and occupational choice (e.g., Prediger, 1994; Tracey & Hopkins, 2001). As a result of changing technologies and organizational structures, an employee's ability to learn new job skills is critical to his/ her continued success in the workplace. However, an employee's perception of his/ her learning potential may be as informative as or more informative than objectively measured ability for subsequent decision making (e.g., job choice). The purpose of this study was to investigate prospective estimates of job performance and learning potential, including gender differences in self-estimates, the determinants of self-estimates, and the predictive validity of self-estimates for decisions about engaging in career-related tasks. The goal of the current study was to evaluate self-estimates of job performance and learning potential for 20 jobs. A total of 153 participants watched short video clips depicting each of the 20 jobs and answered a series of questionnaires, assessing future-oriented estimates of job performance, estimates of learning potential, task interest, task value, task experience, and task engagement. Significant gender differences were found in estimates of job performance across job domains, as well as interactions of gender and self-estimates of job performance over anticipated time-on-task. Some significant relations were found between non-ability traits and self-estimates of job performance and learning potential, while significant relations were found between prior job experience and decisions about task engagement. The practical utility of this research is an understanding of how individual differences in non-ability traits such as personality, interest, and motivation may impact an individual's expectations of future job performance, and consequently, an individual's career choice decisions and job pursuits. en_US
dc.publisher Georgia Institute of Technology en_US
dc.subject Task engagement en_US
dc.subject Learning curves en_US
dc.subject Gender differences en_US
dc.subject Job performance en_US
dc.subject Learning potential en_US
dc.subject Self-estimates en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Learning ability
dc.subject.lcsh Self-perception
dc.subject.lcsh Psychology, Industrial
dc.title Self-estimates of job performance and learning potential en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US
dc.description.degree Ph.D. en_US
dc.contributor.department Psychology en_US
dc.description.advisor Committee Chair: Ackerman, Phillip; Committee Member: Catrambone, Richard; Committee Member: James, Lawrence; Committee Member: Kanfer, Ruth; Committee Member: Parsons, Chuck en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account