Think! Evidence

Non-ability correlates of the science-math trait complex: searching for personality characteristics and revisiting vocational interests

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Toker, Yonca en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-03-04T20:19:56Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-13T10:56:40Z
dc.date.available 2011-03-04T20:19:56Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-13T10:56:40Z
dc.date.issued 2010-11-09 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1853/37175
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/1853/37175
dc.description.abstract The trait complex approach (Ackerman&Heggestad, 1997) makes it possible to study the individual holistically by taking account of various individual differences at the same time, such as abilities, personality, motivation, and vocational preferences. Recently, Kanfer, Wolf, Kantrowitz, and Ackerman (2010) provided support for taking a whole-person approach in predicting academic performance. They also showed the incremental role of non-ability predictors over the role of ability predictors. Objectives of the present study were to further explore the non-ability variables of the science/math trait complex. Identifying the personality correlates of the science/math trait complex was the first objective. Investigation results yielded four personality factors as correlates of the complex, which play important roles for engineers and scientists at different stages of the vocational track: toughmindedness was the personality marker of the science/math trait complex and was associated with intending to pursue a STEM career; achievement and control were associated with academic success in STEM majors; and cognitively-oriented behavior was associated with more cognitively challenging pursuits, such as attending STEM competitions and planning to go on to graduate school. The second purpose was to revisit the vocational interests associated with the science/math trait complex and the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) groups. A new measure was introduced, referred to as STEM Interest Complexity, which measures interests towards engaging in increasingly complex tasks in the Numerical, Symbolic, Spatial, and STEM-related Ideas domains. It was developed to assess the level of vocational interests, in addition to the traditionally assessed direction of vocational interests (Holland, 1985). Validation of the new STEM Interest Complexity measure showed adequate construct and concurrent criterion-related validities. Construct validity was established by demonstrating associations between the new measure and measures of the direction of interests, cognitive abilities, intelligence as personality, and learning goal orientations. Support for the new measure's criterion-related validity was found by demonstrating that the measure discriminates between majors, and predicts vocational criteria (i.e., college achievement in STEM, attachment to STEM fields, major satisfaction, and one's intentions to chose a complex STEM career). With dominance analyses, it was shown that STEM Interest Complexity was the most important vocational assessment in the prediction of criteria. Results support the assertion that vocational interest inventories can be improved by incorporating the level of complexity dimension. Finally, a science/math trait complex composite score, including the personality factors and STEM Interest Complexity, in addition to the previously determined ability, interest, and self-concept associates, showed moderate associations with STEM-related vocational criteria. The non-ability individual differences, which were the focus of the present study, added to the conceptualization and predictive utility of the science/math trait complex. en_US
dc.publisher Georgia Institute of Technology en_US
dc.subject Dominance analysis en_US
dc.subject Vocational counseling en_US
dc.subject Level of interests en_US
dc.subject Interest assessment en_US
dc.subject Vocational fit en_US
dc.subject STEM en_US
dc.subject Occupational complexity en_US
dc.subject Vocational interests en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Mathematical ability
dc.subject.lcsh Personality
dc.subject.lcsh Trait intercorrelations
dc.subject.lcsh Ability Testing
dc.subject.lcsh Occupational aptitude tests
dc.title Non-ability correlates of the science-math trait complex: searching for personality characteristics and revisiting vocational interests en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US
dc.description.degree Ph.D. en_US
dc.contributor.department Psychology en_US
dc.description.advisor Committee Chair: Ackerman, Phillip L.; Committee Member: Embretson, Susan; Committee Member: James, Lawrence R.; Committee Member: Kanfer, Ruth; Committee Member: McKlin, Tom en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account