Think! Evidence

Attachment and early rearing: longitudinal effects in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Clay, Andrea Wolstenholme en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-06-06T16:43:01Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-13T10:56:43Z
dc.date.available 2012-06-06T16:43:01Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-13T10:56:43Z
dc.date.issued 2012-04-04 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1853/43625
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/1853/43625
dc.description.abstract Between the years of 1991 and 1995, two different chimpanzee nursery rearing strategies were employed by caregivers and research staff at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center. One of these strategies included, in addition to the basic care provided by both nurseries, an additional 4 hours of human contact for 5 days each week. This human contact was provided by caregivers instructed in the behavior of chimpanzee mothers toward their offspring and instructed to emulate that behavior as much as possible. Various measures of cognitive and motor development were taken during the first year of the nursery-reared chimpanzees' lives; additionally, a modified version of the Strange Situation Test, used to measure attachment, was used to assess the chimpanzees' attachment style to their primary human caregiver. Based on these measures, chimpanzees reared in the standard care nursery (without the additional human contact) were significantly more likely to exhibit disorganized attachment styles towards their human caregiver; additionally, the standard care chimpanzees displayed less advanced motor and cognitive development. The responsive care chimpanzees (reared with the additional human contact) developed cognitively and in terms of motor function at a faster rate than the standard care chimpanzees; they also exhibited less coping skills. After one year of rearing in these two nurseries, all the chimpanzees were reared in conspecific social groups and the differential nurseries were terminated. In 2011-2012, 22 out of 49 of the original chimpanzee subjects were reassessed in an attempt to determine of long term effects of these differential rearing styles could still be detected. Chimpanzees that were identified as exhibiting disorganized attachment at one year of age exhibited significantly higher rates of abnormal behavior as compared to those that did not exhibit a disorganized attachment style at one year of age. Chimpanzees reared in both nurseries exhibited significantly higher rates of abnormal behavior, solicitation of, and attendance to humans as compared to chimpanzees that were mother-reared. Additionally, chimpanzees reared in either nursery were rated by survey respondents as exhibiting significantly higher human orientation and significantly lower subjective well-being as compared to mother-reared chimpanzees. Finally, trends found in the data consistently indicated that chimpanzees reared with more extensive human contact (responsive care) exhibited higher rates of abnormal behavior, solicitation of, and attendance toward humans as compared to standard care chimpanzees. Trends also indicated consistently that responsive care subjects were scored higher on human orientation and lower on subjective well-being by survey respondents. Sign tests were conducted to explore these differences and consistent support was found for these trends as significant. Further research should be conducted to explore welfare-related issues as related to differential nursery rearing strategies for chimpanzees. en_US
dc.publisher Georgia Institute of Technology en_US
dc.subject Primates en_US
dc.subject Development en_US
dc.subject Attachment en_US
dc.subject Chimpanzees en_US
dc.subject Welfare en_US
dc.subject Behavior en_US
dc.subject Captive management en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Chimpanzees
dc.subject.lcsh Attachment behavior
dc.subject.lcsh Captive mammals
dc.subject.lcsh Developmental biology
dc.title Attachment and early rearing: longitudinal effects in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US
dc.description.degree PhD en_US
dc.contributor.department Psychology en_US
dc.description.advisor Committee Chair: Maple, Terry; Committee Member: Bard, Kim; Committee Member: Bloomsmith, Mollie; Committee Member: Marr, Jackson; Committee Member: Rollins, Howard en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account