Think! Evidence

Theoretical development and empirical examination of the nomological network of off-job reactivity to daily occupational stressors

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Calderwood, Charles Coleman en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-01-17T21:51:27Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-13T10:56:43Z
dc.date.available 2013-01-17T21:51:27Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-13T10:56:43Z
dc.date.issued 2012-10-23 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1853/45862
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/1853/45862
dc.description.abstract A theory of off-job reactivity to daily work stress which encompasses the prediction of levels of reactivity from specific daily occupational stressors and personality traits, and outcomes of state and trait off-job reactivity, is presented and empirically tested. Despite decades of research linking negative spillover to maladaptive work and non-work outcomes, multidimensional studies of manifestations of spillover are rare. While investigators have increasingly recognized that spillover correlates tend to be associated with greater off-job physiological stress responses (Meijman, Mulder, Van Dormolen,&Cremer, 1992), no attempt has been made to incorporate off-job reactivity to daily stress within a multidimensional framework of negative work to non-work spillover. The overarching goal of this dissertation is to develop a model of off-job reactivity to daily occupational stress, comprising cognitive, affective, and behavioral indicators of negative work to non-work spillover. An empirical study is presented in which 75 nurses (N = 75) reported their exposure to different categories of daily work stress and provided measurements of off-job reactivity and anticipated outcomes during their off-job time for four work days. Select personality traits, work characteristics, and trait-level outcome variables were measured via an at-home questionnaire prior to the daily survey period. Empirical validation was obtained for a three-facet, higher-order factor model of off-job reactivity. Negative interpersonal interactions and situational constraints were supported as daily stressor predictors of state off-job reactivity, while trait negative affect and abusive supervision were supported as predictors of this state-level outcome. Elevated off-job reactivity was associated with several maladaptive outcomes, including diminished subjective well-being, elevated work to non-work conflict, greater somatic complaint frequency, and reduced off-job recovery activity pursuit. Implications of these findings for theoretical models of work - non-work relationships, the relative contribution of predictors and outcomes of off-job reactivity, and practical applications of the results of this dissertation are discussed. en_US
dc.publisher Georgia Institute of Technology en_US
dc.subject Off-job time en_US
dc.subject Off-job stress reactivity en_US
dc.subject Negative spillover en_US
dc.subject Daily stress en_US
dc.subject Work - non-work relationships en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Job stress
dc.subject.lcsh Work Psychological aspects
dc.subject.lcsh Stress (Psychology)
dc.subject.lcsh Mental health
dc.title Theoretical development and empirical examination of the nomological network of off-job reactivity to daily occupational stressors en_US
dc.type Dissertation en_US
dc.description.degree PhD en_US
dc.contributor.department Psychology en_US
dc.description.advisor Committee Chair: Phillip L. Ackerman; Committee Member: Cindy Zapata; Committee Member: Davood Tofighi; Committee Member: Rustin Meyer; Committee Member: Ruth Kanfer en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account