Think! Evidence

Macrostability and Microinstabilities in the Scientific Process [In Bulgarian]

Show simple item record

dc.creator B.V. Toshev
dc.date 2008-06-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-20T22:32:44Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-20T22:32:44Z
dc.identifier 1313-1958
dc.identifier 1313-9118
dc.identifier https://doaj.org/article/ac061a10941d4d26984d0cda205154ae
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/22577
dc.description Science advances as a sustainable process. The academic journals mark the new scientific results. The system of scholarly journals is developed in two levels: the first level includes the primary research journals; the secondary journals where the papers of the primary research journals are indexed and abstracted build the second level. The world system of indexing, abstracting and evaluation consists of about 75 000 primary research journals; about 10 % of them are under the control of the Thomson Scientific, f. Institute for Scientific Information. The journals that do not belong to that system are to be considered as marginal editions. Thomson Scientific gives annually several scientometric parameters of its journals. Likely the most important amongst them is the Impact Factor (IF), introduced by Garfield. IF is an intensive property of the academic journal. However the scientific creativity is cumulative and, therefore, a proper extensive quantity should characterize it. Such quantity may be the efficiency factor e=nk with n – factor of productivity (number of publications of a given author) and k – factor of utility (number of citations of author’s publications). From macroscopic point of view such an organization of the scientific process provides its sustainability and stability. However, the microscopic consideration exhibits disturbances that appear continuously. They are in the relationships between authors, referees and editors. They appear when the rules of scientific publishing and/or science ethics are violated by some of the participants in the scientific process. The most common cases of such offences are listed and commented.
dc.language Bulgarian
dc.language English
dc.publisher University of Sofia
dc.relation http://bjsep.org/getfile.php?id=9
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1313-1958
dc.relation https://doaj.org/toc/1313-9118
dc.rights CC BY-NC-ND
dc.source Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy , Vol 2, Iss 1, Pp 5-12 (2008)
dc.subject Primary research journals
dc.subject Secondary journals
dc.subject World system of indexing
dc.subject abstracting and evaluation
dc.subject Impact factor
dc.subject Factor of efficiency
dc.subject Science ethics
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject DOAJ:Education
dc.subject DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.subject Education (General)
dc.subject L7-991
dc.subject Education
dc.subject L
dc.title Macrostability and Microinstabilities in the Scientific Process [In Bulgarian]
dc.type article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account