Construction d’un dispositif d’évaluation des enseignements et des formations : le point de vue des apprenants

dc.creator	Marc Weisser
dc.creator	Christine Gangloff
dc.creator	Saloua Bennaghmouch
dc.creator	Sondess-Ben Abid-Zarrouk
dc.date	2011-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.date.accessioned	2015-08-12T11:17:48Z
dc.date.available	2015-08-12T11:17:48Z
dc.identifier	10.4000/questionsvives.407
dc.identifier	1635-4079
dc.identifier	1775-433X
dc.identifier	https://doaj.org/article/9ee3d63ef01f42039da5bbd414aedd39
dc.identifier.uri	http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/26487
dc.description	L’université française a l’habitude d’évaluer ses étudiants. Mais l’exigence d’évaluer les systèmes de formation eux-mêmes apparaît progressivement. Le but est d’une part d’améliorer la qualité des enseignements, et d’autre part de permettre la comparaison des systèmes éducatifs. Dans ce contexte, notre recherche consiste à recueillir le point de vue des étudiants sur les critères de qualité d’une formation. Nous avons procédé à des entretiens sous forme de focus groups. Nous avons interrogé un panel représentatif de l’ensemble des dispositifs : formation générale / formation professionnelle ; UFR / IUT / Écoles d’Ingénieurs ; en début de formation / en fin de formation. Nous avons de la sorte pu identifier les positions constantes d’un groupe à l’autre, ainsi que les avis complémentaires.<br>One of the main missions of French university is to evaluate students. But the requirement to assess also training systems is gradually growing. The goal is, on the one hand, to improve the quality of courses and training, and, on the other hand, to allow the comparison of educational systems. In this context, our research consists in collecting the students’ point of view about the quality standards they look for during their training. We organized interviews using the methodology of focus groups. We questioned a representative panel of students: general training / vocational training; UFR / IUT / Schools of Engineers; at the beginning of their training / at the end of their training. Then, we identified the constant positions from one group to another, as well as complementary opinions.
dc.language	French
dc.publisher	Université de Provence - Département des Sciences de l'éducation
dc.relation	http://questionsvives.revues.org/407
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/1635-4079
dc.relation	https://doaj.org/toc/1775-433X
dc.source	Questions Vives : Recherches en Éducation, Iss Vol.6 n°12, Pp 61-76 (2011)
dc.subject	training evaluation
dc.subject	quality standards
dc.subject	university
dc.subject	focus group
dc.subject	critères de qualité
dc.subject	université
dc.subject	focus group
dc.subject	évaluation des formations
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	DOAJ:Education
dc.subject	DOAJ:Social Sciences
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.subject	Education (General)
dc.subject	L7-991
dc.subject	Education
dc.subject	L
dc.title	Construction d’un dispositif d’évaluation des enseignements et des formations : le point de vue des apprenants
dc.type	article