dc.creator |
Schulze, Johannes |
|
dc.creator |
Drolshagen, Stefan |
|
dc.date |
2006-08-01T00:00:00Z |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-08-12T11:18:33Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-08-12T11:18:33Z |
|
dc.identifier |
1860-7446 |
|
dc.identifier |
1860-3572 |
|
dc.identifier |
https://doaj.org/article/9b8bd7fe405845c6a03189567bba51c3 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/27014 |
|
dc.description |
[english] According to the new German licensing regulations all clinical certificates have to be graded; mostly this requires written tests. Methods tested to date include tests for passive knowledge (single choice questions, multiple choice questions, progress test) and active knowledge (short essay questions, long essay questions). We discuss advantages and disadvantages of these methods, as well as the resources required for test preparation, testing and grading of student answers. <br>[german] Alle Leistungsnachweise des klinischen Studienabschnittes nach neuer Ärztlicher Approbationsordnung müssen benotet werden; hierzu sind in der Regel schriftliche Prüfungen notwendig. Bisher erprobte Methoden beinhalten die Prüfung passiven Wissens (Einfachauswahlfragen, multiple choice-Fragen, progress test-Fragen) und aktiven Wissens (short essay questions, long essay questions). Vor- und Nachteile dieser Verfahren werden diskutiert, sowie die zur Erstellung, Durchführung und Auswertung schriftlicher Prüfungen notwendigen Ressourcen. |
|
dc.publisher |
German Medical Science |
|
dc.relation |
http://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/zma/2006-23/zma000263.shtml |
|
dc.relation |
https://doaj.org/toc/1860-7446 |
|
dc.relation |
https://doaj.org/toc/1860-3572 |
|
dc.rights |
CC BY-NC-ND |
|
dc.source |
GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung, Vol 23, Iss 3, p Doc44 (2006) |
|
dc.subject |
single choice questions |
|
dc.subject |
multiple choice questions |
|
dc.subject |
short essay questions |
|
dc.subject |
long essay questions |
|
dc.subject |
assessment |
|
dc.subject |
Validity |
|
dc.subject |
reliability |
|
dc.subject |
objecitvity |
|
dc.subject |
ressources |
|
dc.subject |
Einfachauswahlverfahren |
|
dc.subject |
MC-Fragen |
|
dc.subject |
short essay questions |
|
dc.subject |
long essey questions |
|
dc.subject |
Prüfungen |
|
dc.subject |
Validität |
|
dc.subject |
Reliabilität |
|
dc.subject |
Objektivität |
|
dc.subject |
Ressourcen |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Education |
|
dc.subject |
DOAJ:Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Education |
|
dc.subject |
L |
|
dc.subject |
Special aspects of education |
|
dc.subject |
LC8-6691 |
|
dc.title |
Format und Durchführung schriftlicher Prüfungen [Format and implementation of written assessments] |
|
dc.type |
article |
|