Think! Evidence

Using the conditional reasoning test for aggression to predict corrective action requests in a sample of nuclear power plant employees

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author DeSimone, Justin A. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-10T17:02:28Z
dc.date.accessioned 2015-07-13T10:56:38Z
dc.date.available 2010-06-10T17:02:28Z
dc.date.available 2015-07-13T10:56:38Z
dc.date.issued 2010-03-22 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1853/33978
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/1853/33978
dc.description.abstract There have been a number of studies showing that the Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression (CRT-A) is a valid measure of one's implicit preparedness to engage in activities that are intended to harm others. Few studies have examined the predictive power of subscales of the CRT-A. The purpose of this project is to examine the validity of the CRT-A and its subscales for predicting unnecessary corrective action requests filed in a sample of employees working in a nuclear power plant. Results indicate that the Powerlessness subscale differentiates employees who file unnecessary reports from employees who do not. en_US
dc.publisher Georgia Institute of Technology en_US
dc.subject Personality en_US
dc.subject Aggression en_US
dc.subject Conditional reasoning en_US
dc.subject Corrective action en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Aggressiveness Testing
dc.subject.lcsh Control (Psychology)
dc.title Using the conditional reasoning test for aggression to predict corrective action requests in a sample of nuclear power plant employees en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.description.degree M.S. en_US
dc.contributor.department Psychology en_US
dc.description.advisor Committee Chair: James, Lawrence; Committee Member: Feldman, Jack; Committee Member: Roberts, James en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account