dc.contributor.author |
DeSimone, Justin A. |
en_US |
dc.date.accessioned |
2010-06-10T17:02:28Z |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2015-07-13T10:56:38Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2010-06-10T17:02:28Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2015-07-13T10:56:38Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2010-03-22 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1853/33978 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/1853/33978 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
There have been a number of studies showing that the Conditional Reasoning Test for Aggression (CRT-A) is a valid measure of one's implicit preparedness to engage in activities that are intended to harm others. Few studies have examined the predictive power of subscales of the CRT-A. The purpose of this project is to examine the validity of the CRT-A and its subscales for predicting unnecessary corrective action requests filed in a sample of employees working in a nuclear power plant. Results indicate that the Powerlessness subscale differentiates employees who file unnecessary reports from employees who do not. |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Georgia Institute of Technology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Personality |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Aggression |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Conditional reasoning |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Corrective action |
en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh |
Aggressiveness Testing |
|
dc.subject.lcsh |
Control (Psychology) |
|
dc.title |
Using the conditional reasoning test for aggression to predict corrective action requests in a sample of nuclear power plant employees |
en_US |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en_US |
dc.description.degree |
M.S. |
en_US |
dc.contributor.department |
Psychology |
en_US |
dc.description.advisor |
Committee Chair: James, Lawrence; Committee Member: Feldman, Jack; Committee Member: Roberts, James |
en_US |