Think! Evidence

The Perils of Pondering: Intuition and Thin Slice Judgements

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ambady, Nalini
dc.date.accessioned 2015-03-11T11:13:01Z
dc.date.available 2015-03-11T11:13:01Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.identifier.citation Psychological Inquiry
dc.identifier.issn 1532-7965
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/14
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.524882
dc.identifier.uri http://ambadylab.stanford.edu/pubs/2010Ambady_PsychInquiry.pdf
dc.description.abstract Intuitive processing is critical for effective social and interpersonal interactions. Previous work has found that people are able to form accurate impressions that predict certain ecologically valid outcomes from brief observations or “thin slices” of behavior. This article discusses theoretical and empirical work showing that thin slice judgments are intuitive and efficient. Thin slice judgments can be made accurately even under conditions of distraction. Moreover, such judgments are impeded by tasks that interfere with the intuitive process. Thin slice judgments are impeded by tasks involving deliberation such as reasons analyses tasks. Thus, impressionistic, evaluative thin slice judgments seem to be intuitive.
dc.title The Perils of Pondering: Intuition and Thin Slice Judgements
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Intuition [30]
    Resources about the role of intuition in thinking skills

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account