Think! Evidence

Intuition and evidence--uneasy bedfellows?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Greenhalgh, Trisha
dc.date.accessioned 2015-03-11T11:13:02Z
dc.date.available 2015-03-11T11:13:02Z
dc.date.issued 2002
dc.identifier.citation British Journal of General Practice
dc.identifier.issn 0960-1643
dc.identifier.issn 1478-5242
dc.identifier.uri http://bjgp.org/content/52/478/395
dc.identifier.uri http://evidence.thinkportal.org/handle/123456789/15
dc.description.abstract Intuition is a decision-making method that is used unconsciously by experienced practitioners but is inaccessible to the novice. It is rapid, subtle, contextual, and does not follow simple, cause-and-effect logic. Evidence-based medicine offers exciting opportunities_for improving patient outcomes, but the 'evidence-burdened' approach of the inexperienced, protocol-driven clinician is well documented Intuition is not unscientific. It is a highly creative process, fundamental to hypothesis generation in science. The experienced practitioner should generate and follow clinical hunches as well as (not instead of applying the deductive principles of evidence-based medicine. The educational research literature suggests that we can improve our intuitive powers through systematic critical reflection about intuitive judgements--for example, through creative writing and dialogue with professional colleagues. It is time to revive and celebrate clinical storytelling as a method for professional education and development. The stage is surely set for a new, improved--and, indeed, evidence-based--'Balint'group.
dc.subject Intuition
dc.title Intuition and evidence--uneasy bedfellows?
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Intuition [30]
    Resources about the role of intuition in thinking skills

Show simple item record

Search Think! Evidence


Browse

My Account